Connect with us


Malegaon Residents Demand Release Of Innocents



Malegaon: Ayesha, 4, wears a blank look as her mother Badrunissa talks about her absent father. Raees Razzab Ali was arrested as a suspect soon after the September 8, 2006, Malegaon serial blasts and Ayesha, his daughter, was born when he was in police custody. “She doesn’t recognise him and runs away if he tries to hold her when we visit him in jail,” Badrunissa said.

Malegaon Residents Demand Release Of InnocentsBadrunissa and the families of eight other Muslim men, who were arrested for the blasts at a mosque in Malegaon that killed 37 people as they were leaving after evening prayers, are pinning their hopes on the confession purported to have been made before a magistrate by Swami Aseemanand, member of the right-wing Hindu group Abhinav Bharat, acknowledging responsibility for the Malegaon blast. They all hope their men will soon be released.

Aseemanand is also an accused in the Ajmer, Hyderabad and Samjhauta Express blasts, all in 2007.

“We want an immediate pardon,” said Qamar Jahan, wife of Shabbir Ahmed, who had been named as the mastermind behind the Malegaon blasts in the chargesheet filed by the Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS). Qamar is part of a delegation, leaving for Mumbai on Sunday night, which plans to meet the Maharashtra chief minister, deputy chief minister and home minister.

Advocate Momin Mujeeb Ahmed, who is representing some of the Malegaon blast accused, said the delegation would include wives and family members of the accused. “From day one, we claimed that they had been wrongly arrested, but no one was paying heed to us. Now, they will believe us,” Ahmed said.

“My only grudge is that they should have investigated the case in a better way and should not have waited for this man (Aseemanand) to confess in order to believe us.”

Ahmed said they would also seek compensation from the government for wrongful incarceration.

However, families of some of the accused say cannot give them back what they have lost. “Can the government return to us everything that we have lost in the last five years?” said Qamar.

Even the victims of the blasts support the families of the accused. Ashfaq Ahmed, whose sons – Mohammed Umar Farooq, 18, and Mohammed Owais, 8 – were injured in the blasts, said they never doubted that the arrested men were innocent.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Pakistani Anti-graft body wants travel ban on Nawaz Sharif, kin



Nawaz sharif

Pakistan’s anti-corruption watchdog has asked authorities to place ousted premier Nawaz Sharif, his daughter and son-in-law on the Exit Control List to prevent them from leaving the country.

The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) sent a formal request to the ministry of interior. The interior ministry officials confirmed that the NAB wrote that names of Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Capt (retd) Muhammad Safdar should be put on the Exit Control List (ECL), which listed individuals not allowed to leave Pakistan.

The NAB argued that as the trial of the three nears its conclusion, it is feared that they would leave the country.

Earlier, a similar request to place name of finance minister Ishaq Dar on ECL was not accepted, allowing him to go to London and never return.

Sharif, 68, and his family this week filed an application with the accountability court seeking a fortnight’s exemption from personal appearance from February 19 onwards to let them go to London to see Sharif’s ailing wife. Three cases were filed against Sharif and his family last year, including Avenfield properties, Azizia & Hill Metal Establishment, and Flagship Investments.

Maryam and Safdar are accused only in Avenfield properties case. The NAB had filed two supplementary references against Sharif, his sons Hasan and Hussain regarding Al-Azizia Steel Mills & Hill Metal Establishment and Flagship Investment cases.

Continue Reading


Pakistan “breaches obligations’ on nuclear arms reduction, UN court told




The Hague: Pakistan is violating its “obligations” to the international community by failing to reduce its nuclear arsenal, the Marshall Islands told the UN’s highest court on Tuesday.

The small Pacific Island nation is this week launching three unusual cases against India, Pakistan and Britain before the International Court of Justice.

Majuro wants to put a new spotlight on the global nuclear threat, its lawyers said yesterday, by using its own experience with massive US-led nuclear tests in the 1940s and 1950s.

“Pakistan is in breach of its obligations owed to the international community as a whole,” when it comes to reducing its nuclear stockpile, said Nicholas Grief, one of the island nation’s lawyers.

Islamabad and its nuclear-armed neighbour India “continue to engage in a quantitative build-up and a qualitative improvement” of their atomic stockpiles, added Tony deBrum, a Marshallese government minister.

DeBrum warned that even a “limited nuclear war” involving the two countries would “threaten the existence” of his island nation people.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since independence from Britain in 1947, two of them over the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir.

In 1998, the rival neighbours both demonstrated nuclear weapons capability.

The ICJ’s judges are holding hearings for the next week and a half to decide whether it is competent to hear the lawsuits brought against India and Pakistan — neither of which have signed the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

A third hearing against Britain — which has signed the NPT — scheduled to start on Wednesday will be devoted to “preliminary objections” raised by London.

The Marshalls initially sought to bring a case against nine countries it said possessed nuclear arms: Britain, China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia and the United States.
Israel has never admitted to having nuclear weapons.

But the Hague-based ICJ, set up in 1945 to rule in disputes between states, has only admitted three cases against Britain, India and Pakistan, because they have accepted the ICJ’s compulsory jurisdiction.

Pakistan’s lawyers did not attend Tuesday’s hearings.

It did however file a counter-claim against Majuro’s allegations saying “the court has no jurisdiction to deal with the application” and insisting that the case is “not admissible”, said ICJ President Ronny Abraham.

Continue Reading


Bangladesh to drop Islam as official religion following attacks on Hindus



Bangladesh to drop Islam as official religion following attacks on Hindus

New Delhi: Bangladesh is likely to drop Islam as its official religion following a series of attacks on people from other faiths in the country. The country’s Supreme Court is hearing a plea challenging the status of the official religion of the country to Islam.

Bangladesh, which was declared a secular country after its formation in 1971, was declared an Islamic country following a constitutional amendment in 1988.

According to a report in the Daily Mail, the plea has challenged the declaration of Islam as the national religion of the country.

The move is being supported by leaders from the minority communities like Hindus, Christians and Muslim minority Shiites.

Bangladesh has 90 per cent of Muslims, 8 per cent Hindus and remaining constitutes Christians and Muslim minority Shiites.

In last month, a Hindu priest was hacked to death following an attack on a temple in Panchgarh district. Two others were seriously injured in the attack. There have been several lethal attacks on writers and bloggers.

According to a report in the Independent, Islamist groups Jumatul Mujahedeen Bangladesh and Ansarullah Bangla Team are believed to have carried out at least seven attacks on foreign and minority people in Bangladesh in the past year.




Continue Reading

Follow us on Twitter


Skip to toolbar